His administration office submitted a letter to Trump’s lawyers indicating they would continue to pursue the civil case.
New York Attorney General Letitia James’ administration indicated she will not drop her civil fraud case against President-elect Donald Trump, his sons and his company, which resulted in a verdict of more than $450 million last day.
Earlier, the Fresh York Pass judgment on Arthur Angoron ordered Trump to pay $454 million in a civil fraud judgment in James’ lawsuit against Trump and his corporate, Trump Group, he argued in his ruling. Was that he believes Trump defrauded banks, insurers and. Traders reportedly exaggerated his web importance and the valuation of his homes.
“Your letter presents no basis for this Office to vacate the final decision or dismiss this action,” he wrote to his attorney in a letter uploaded online Tuesday.
Vale additionally argued that “the normal burden of civil litigation does not impede the President’s official duties in a way that violates the U.S. Constitution” and that a case brought through the administrative center of a legal professional general is civil, no longer Not legal.
Similar Stories
“The final judgment relates only to business conduct conducted by entities that are part of the Trump Organization and individual defendants who were acting on behalf of the Trump Organization,” Vale said. “Thus this decision does not relate to any conduct related to Mr. Trump’s first term as President.”
The letter says it “does not cover any conduct that Mr. Trump might pursue after his upcoming inauguration,” adding that presidents “are not exempt from civil lawsuits arising from unethical conduct.” Is.”
His legal professionals wrote, “Based on the decision in this case, no company will want to come to New York to do business and many businesses will be fleeing.” “The economic aspects of this decision are a disaster for New York.”
Fresh York Lawyer Normal’s administrative center, he added, “has used the law in a way that has never been seen before.”
In September, a panel of the New York Appellate Division court hearing Trump’s appeal expressed skepticism about Angorone’s decision and James’s case during oral arguments.
“Every case you cite involves harm to consumers, harm to the market,” David Friedman told Valedictory on September 26.
“We don’t have anything like that,” he said of the case against Trump, adding that no one has “lost any money.”
The judges also wondered what constraints were imposed on the rules James cited in bringing the case, noting that fraudsters are generally older in age, potentially Target customers.
“How do we draw a line or at least put up guardrails? Justice Peter Moulton asked at one point.
However, Vale countered by saying that this case is justified because “when risk is injected into the market, it causes losses to counterparties and it hurts the market as a whole.” He said the statute being applied in the civil case, known as Government Act 63(12), is broadly aimed at preventing fraud and illegality and is therefore appropriate for Trump’s case.
So far, neither Trump nor his team have responded to Vale’s letter. The Epoch Times contacted its transition team for comment Tuesday, but received a negative reply during press week.
Reuters contributed to this record.
